Labels are not conclusions
The lease language determines treatment, not the landlord’s account name by itself.
Worked professional example
Seven charges in. $37,130 flagged for adjustment.
We tested CloseDelta against a published professional training example. The tool separated lease exclusions from the fixed fee that the example treated as allowed—and kept the notice problem visible.
Example statement total$39,191.47
- Flagged by lease rules
- $37,130.00
- Treated as allowed
- $2,061.47
- Charges reviewed
- 7
What this proves
The tool can reproduce a known clause-to-charge review.
It does not prove that every flagged dollar is recoverable in a live dispute. A real outcome depends on the signed lease, complete support, notice procedure, facts, and professional judgment.
Line-by-line result
Every amount stays tied to a treatment and clause.
| Statement charge | Amount | Treatment | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Office phone & fax | $1,807.00 | Excluded | Section 6(b)(3) |
| Legal fees | $1,500.00 | Excluded | Section 6(b)(7) |
| Management fees | $16,392.00 | Excluded | Section 6(b)(3) |
| Accounting | $769.00 | Excluded | Section 6(b)(3) |
| Tenant-specific trash | $5,529.00 | Excluded | Section 6(b)(12) |
| Capital reserve | $11,133.00 | Excluded | Section 6(b)(4) |
| Fixed administration fee | $2,061.47 | Allowed | Section 6(a) |
Allowed is different from supported
A permitted fee still needs the correct base, rate, allocation, and calculation.
Procedure can decide the outcome
The example included a 30-day window and a late or misdirected notice condition.
Figures are reproduced from a publicly available ICSC professional education example and used to validate the screening logic. This is a worked example, not a CloseDelta customer result or a claim that money was recovered.